Zsolt Molnár

Zsolt Molnar is a professor in anesthesiology and intensive therapy. He is the Head of Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy at Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. He also holds a part time professorship at the department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy at the Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. Since 2019 he has been leading of the Critical Care Study Group at the Centre for Translational Medicine at Semmelweis University. His general main research interests are: sepsis related hemodynamic changes, fluid therapy, markers of inflammation, extracorporeal cytokine removal in hyperinflammation, oxygen debt and perioperative intensive care. Ha has been a regular invited speaker on large international, regional and national conferences all over Europe and overseas as well, with more than 300 invited international lectures over the last 5 years. He has published more than 260 articles, with an Independent citation index (Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=RmhzXrIAAAAJ&hl=hu&oi=ao): 8944, a Hirsch-index of 44.

18th September 2026 Friday

Time Session
13:30
15:30
  • Zsolt MolnárHungary Speaker Managing Patients with Sepsis: modifying the course with ECOSA dysregulated host response to infection is central to the pathophysiology of sepsis and may culminate in life-threatening organ dysfunction. Given that this process is largely characterized by concurrent pro- and anti-inflammatory activation, immunomodulatory strategies have long been explored in sepsis research. Among these, extracorporeal removal of circulating cytokines, inflammatory mediators and other soluble factors through non-specific hemoadsorption with macroporous styrene-divinylbenzene sorbents has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. Its adoption into clinical practice has largely been based on pathophysiological considerations rather than on evidence from large, well-designed randomized clinical trials. Over the past 15 years, most of the available evidence has been predominantly derived from small, single-center cohorts, reports from registries and heterogeneous prospective studies with substantial variability in patients’ selection, timing, and treatment intensity. In addition, the precise mechanisms of action of hemoadsorption remain incompletely understood. Although several meta-analyses have attempted to synthesize the existing data, the overall quality and heterogeneity of the included studies limit the strength and reliability of their conclusions. As a result, current guideline recommendations are largely based on expert opinions rather than high-certainty evidence. This presentation aims to provide a concise overview of the biological rationale, current evidence, and contemporary clinical practice related to hemoadsorption in sepsis.Multimodal individualized hemodynamic managementAchieving hemodynamic stability in the critically ill patents has a pivotal role in ensuring positive outcomes. The pathomechanism is complex and include impaired myocardial contractility, relative or absolute intravascular hypovolaemia, bradycardia, and thus eventually impaired blood flow. Arterial pressure can be monitored continuously, which makes it the most important and feasible tool to assess circulation in real time. A given level of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) is often regarded as the main target to be normalized in several guidelines. However, it is not the sole determinant of organ perfusion pressure and, although coupled to blood flow, is not a surrogate of blood flow or tissue perfusion. Conversely, normotension does not guarantee adequate organ blood flow and may just mimic ‘occult hypoperfusion’. Therefore, achieving hemodynamic coherence between macro- and microcirculation should be our pivotal aim during resuscitation and hemodynamic management. This requires a complex approach that is called multimodal, individualised, contextualised management that takes into account all measurable components of oxygen delivery and consumption, organ perfusion and cardiac output. How to do it at the bedside, will be presented on this lecture.
  • Keith Wille Speaker Connectology with Hybrid Systems: ECMO, Apheresis, ECCO2RExtracorporeal life support technologies are increasingly used in critical care settings, with integrating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), apheresis, and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) to provide multi-organ support. This session explores the principles, clinical applications, and challenges of extracorporeal systems and their integration into CRRT, focusing on the interaction between ECMO and renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the role of ECCO2R in respiratory failure, and the combination of apheresis for immunomodulation. Through discussion, participants will gain an understanding of patient selection, circuit configurations, anticoagulation strategies, and the physiological considerations that impact patient outcomes. Emphasis will be placed on optimizing patient management, recognizing complications, and developing a structured approach to hybrid extracorporeal therapy.AKI in Mechanical Circulatory SupportAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and important complication of cardiogenic shock and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, reflecting reduced cardiac output and renal perfusion, venous congestion, neurohormonal activation, systemic inflammation, vasopressor exposure, and hemodynamic instability. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may interrupt this cycle by restoring cardiac output, reducing venous congestion, and decreasing vasopressor requirements; however, MCS itself may contribute to kidney injury through hemolysis, embolic events, limb ischemia and rhabdomyolysis, bleeding, contrast exposure, and device-related hemodynamic disturbances. This presentation will review the mechanisms and clinical impact of AKI across commonly used temporary and durable MCS platforms, including intra-aortic balloon pumps, microaxial flow pumps, temporary ventricular assist devices, and durable LVADs. Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying potentially reversible contributors to AKI, understanding the relationship between timing of circulatory support and renal recovery, and managing patients who require concurrent kidney replacement therapy. Practical considerations for CRRT, including vascular access, anticoagulation, ultrafiltration, and interactions between CRRT and MCS, will also be discussed. How do I care for the Patient with ARDS and AKIAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently coexist in critically ill patients and together are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Their management is closely intertwined: mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure, hemodynamic support, and fluid administration may influence renal perfusion and venous congestion, while AKI and fluid accumulation can worsen pulmonary edema, impair gas exchange, and complicate ventilator management. This presentation will provide a practical approach to the patient with concurrent ARDS and AKI, integrating pulmonary and kidney-focused strategies. Key topics will include lung-protective ventilation and its renal consequences, assessment and management of volume status, the role of conservative fluid strategies and de-resuscitation, and the use of diuretics and kidney replacement therapy to achieve fluid-balance goals. Attention will be given to when and how continuous renal replacement therapy can support fluid management in patients with severe respiratory failure, including those with hemodynamic instability. The session will emphasize coordinated decision-making between critical care and nephrology teams to balance lung protection, kidney perfusion, and overall organ support.
    Nuttha LumlertgulThailand Speaker Solution and Fluid BalanceUtility of Lung Ultrasound, VEXUS and Bioimpedance Analysis in Volume Assessment During RRTPersonalized Fluid Management with CRRT
Room 103

19th September 2026 Saturday

Time Session
12:40
13:45
  • Zsolt MolnárHungary Speaker Managing Patients with Sepsis: modifying the course with ECOSA dysregulated host response to infection is central to the pathophysiology of sepsis and may culminate in life-threatening organ dysfunction. Given that this process is largely characterized by concurrent pro- and anti-inflammatory activation, immunomodulatory strategies have long been explored in sepsis research. Among these, extracorporeal removal of circulating cytokines, inflammatory mediators and other soluble factors through non-specific hemoadsorption with macroporous styrene-divinylbenzene sorbents has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. Its adoption into clinical practice has largely been based on pathophysiological considerations rather than on evidence from large, well-designed randomized clinical trials. Over the past 15 years, most of the available evidence has been predominantly derived from small, single-center cohorts, reports from registries and heterogeneous prospective studies with substantial variability in patients’ selection, timing, and treatment intensity. In addition, the precise mechanisms of action of hemoadsorption remain incompletely understood. Although several meta-analyses have attempted to synthesize the existing data, the overall quality and heterogeneity of the included studies limit the strength and reliability of their conclusions. As a result, current guideline recommendations are largely based on expert opinions rather than high-certainty evidence. This presentation aims to provide a concise overview of the biological rationale, current evidence, and contemporary clinical practice related to hemoadsorption in sepsis.Multimodal individualized hemodynamic managementAchieving hemodynamic stability in the critically ill patents has a pivotal role in ensuring positive outcomes. The pathomechanism is complex and include impaired myocardial contractility, relative or absolute intravascular hypovolaemia, bradycardia, and thus eventually impaired blood flow. Arterial pressure can be monitored continuously, which makes it the most important and feasible tool to assess circulation in real time. A given level of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) is often regarded as the main target to be normalized in several guidelines. However, it is not the sole determinant of organ perfusion pressure and, although coupled to blood flow, is not a surrogate of blood flow or tissue perfusion. Conversely, normotension does not guarantee adequate organ blood flow and may just mimic ‘occult hypoperfusion’. Therefore, achieving hemodynamic coherence between macro- and microcirculation should be our pivotal aim during resuscitation and hemodynamic management. This requires a complex approach that is called multimodal, individualised, contextualised management that takes into account all measurable components of oxygen delivery and consumption, organ perfusion and cardiac output. How to do it at the bedside, will be presented on this lecture.
Room 103
14:00
15:30
Managing Patients with Sepsis: Modifying the Course with ECOS
  • Thomas RimmeléFrance Speaker Managing Patients with Sepsis: Modifying the Course with ECOSImmune Disorders of AKI Patients Following Various Types of Injuries ?How Do I Use Hemadsorption in My Practice
    Zsolt MolnárHungary Speaker Managing Patients with Sepsis: modifying the course with ECOSA dysregulated host response to infection is central to the pathophysiology of sepsis and may culminate in life-threatening organ dysfunction. Given that this process is largely characterized by concurrent pro- and anti-inflammatory activation, immunomodulatory strategies have long been explored in sepsis research. Among these, extracorporeal removal of circulating cytokines, inflammatory mediators and other soluble factors through non-specific hemoadsorption with macroporous styrene-divinylbenzene sorbents has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. Its adoption into clinical practice has largely been based on pathophysiological considerations rather than on evidence from large, well-designed randomized clinical trials. Over the past 15 years, most of the available evidence has been predominantly derived from small, single-center cohorts, reports from registries and heterogeneous prospective studies with substantial variability in patients’ selection, timing, and treatment intensity. In addition, the precise mechanisms of action of hemoadsorption remain incompletely understood. Although several meta-analyses have attempted to synthesize the existing data, the overall quality and heterogeneity of the included studies limit the strength and reliability of their conclusions. As a result, current guideline recommendations are largely based on expert opinions rather than high-certainty evidence. This presentation aims to provide a concise overview of the biological rationale, current evidence, and contemporary clinical practice related to hemoadsorption in sepsis.Multimodal individualized hemodynamic managementAchieving hemodynamic stability in the critically ill patents has a pivotal role in ensuring positive outcomes. The pathomechanism is complex and include impaired myocardial contractility, relative or absolute intravascular hypovolaemia, bradycardia, and thus eventually impaired blood flow. Arterial pressure can be monitored continuously, which makes it the most important and feasible tool to assess circulation in real time. A given level of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) is often regarded as the main target to be normalized in several guidelines. However, it is not the sole determinant of organ perfusion pressure and, although coupled to blood flow, is not a surrogate of blood flow or tissue perfusion. Conversely, normotension does not guarantee adequate organ blood flow and may just mimic ‘occult hypoperfusion’. Therefore, achieving hemodynamic coherence between macro- and microcirculation should be our pivotal aim during resuscitation and hemodynamic management. This requires a complex approach that is called multimodal, individualised, contextualised management that takes into account all measurable components of oxygen delivery and consumption, organ perfusion and cardiac output. How to do it at the bedside, will be presented on this lecture.
    Bang-Gee HsuTaiwan Moderator
    YU-FENG LINTaiwan Moderator
Room 103
16:00
17:40
Kent DoiJapan Moderator Organ Crosstalk in AKIAcute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently complicated by distant organ dysfunction, significantly increasing patient morbidity and mortality. Recent clinical and experimental evidence highlights complex inter-organ crosstalk mechanisms, such as systemic cytokine release, oxidative stress, immune dysregulation, and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), that mediate extrarenal tissue injury. Experimental studies demonstrate distinct pathophysiological axes connecting the injured kidney with the heart and lungs. Specifically, mitochondrial dysfunction plays a critical role in acute cardiorenal syndrome. Furthermore, in AKI-induced acute lung injury, in addition to activation of the HMGB1–Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) pathway and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), recent studies have reported a novel pathophysiological mechanism of impaired gas exchange mediated by neutrophil retention. This presentation provides an updated overview of the molecular pathways driving AKI-induced distant organ crosstalk, emphasizing key pathophysiology involving the heart and lungs, and discusses targeted therapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcomes in multi-organ failure.Heterogeneity and Future Direction of Major Adverse Kidney EventsThe "AKI/AKD/CKD axis" represents a critical continuum in nephrology, highlighting that acute kidney injury (AKI) is not merely a self-limiting episode but a potent driver of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Numerous clinical studies have reported the epidemiology of the AKI-to-CKD transition, demonstrating how recurrent or severe AKI accelerates renal decline. Crucially, methodological heterogeneity in defining Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE), as highlighted by our recent scoping review (Maeda et al., Intensive Care Med 2024), complicates the interpretation of clinical trial outcomes. To ensure the success of future clinical trials targeting AKI and the AKI-to-CKD transition, we must not only identify optimal therapeutic targets, but also establish standardized outcomes that directly align with improved patient care.Targeted Polymyxin B Hemadsorption in Sepsis: Lessons from Japanese Experience and Patient SelectionPolymyxin B haemadsorption (PMX-HA) has a long clinical history in Japan in the treatment of endotoxemia and septic shock. However, recent international randomized controlled trials and clinical guidelines have caused controversy regarding its routine use, citing inconsistent survival benefits in unselected populations. This presentation reviews the evolution of PMX-HA, from its origins in extensive Japanese clinical experience to modern precision medicine approaches in intensive care. Recent secondary analyses and real-world studies have highlighted significant heterogeneity in treatment effects, underscoring the necessity of appropriate patient selection. Subgroup analyses from the EUPHRATES trial demonstrated the potential efficacy of PMX-HA in patients with moderate-to-high endotoxin activity levels (EAA 0.6–0.9) and high severity of organ failure. Furthermore, machine learning applications such as causal forest modelling on large observational and trial cohorts have successfully identified specific biomarker profiles and clinical characteristics that define true responders.
  • John ProwleUnited Kingdom Speaker Trajectories of Critical Illness – Defining Endotypes from Routine DataCritical illness is a heterogeneous syndrome characterized by diverse clinical trajectories and variable responses to treatment. Defining biologically and clinically meaningful endotypes using routinely collected healthcare data offers an opportunity to improve risk stratification, prognostication, and personalized therapeutic strategies, enabling earlier intervention, enhanced clinical decision-making, and precision medicine in critical care. In particular the transition from acute to persistent critical illness represents a pivotal phase in intensive care, marked by a shift from the initial disease insult to prolonged organ dysfunction driven by complex host responses. Early identification of patients at risk of this transition remains a major clinical challenge and opportunity.Dynamic Prescription of CRRT Ready for Prime TimeContinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has evolved from a standardized supportive therapy to a platform for precision critical care. Increasing evidence suggests that fixed prescriptions fail to accommodate the dynamic physiological changes encountered during critical illness, resulting in suboptimal solute clearance, fluid management, and metabolic control. Dynamic prescription integrates evolving haemodynamic status, fluid balance, acid–base homeostasis, electrolyte disturbances, and recovery trajectories to optimize therapy delivery while minimizing complications and treatment interruptions. This paradigm supports individualized kidney support rather than protocol-driven care. Emerging decision-support systems and data-driven algorithms have the potential to transform CRRT into a responsive, patient-centred intervention, improving kidney recovery, organ support, and outcomes in critically ill patients. Adapting CRRT for patients with Electrolyte and acid-base disordersContinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is uniquely positioned to provide precise correction of complex electrolyte and acid–base disturbances in critically ill patients. Beyond kidney support, modern CRRT prescriptions can be individualized to account for the severity and evolution of dysnatremia, dyskalemia, calcium disorders, and metabolic acidosis or alkalosis. Customization of dialysate and replacement fluid composition, treatment dose, buffer delivery, and regional citrate anticoagulation enables controlled correction while minimizing the risks of metabolic complications. Dynamic prescription based on serial biochemical monitoring and changing clinical physiology can be embedded into treatment protocols, facilitating safe correction of sodium, potassium, calcium, and bicarbonate abnormalities while optimizing organ support and improving outcomes in critically ill patients. Extracorporeal Therapies in Trauma, Burns and Cerebral OedemaExtracorporeal therapies (ECTs) are an important adjunct in the management of critically ill patients with severe trauma, major burns, and brain injuries. Acute kidney injury, systemic inflammation, rhabdomyolysis, and profound fluid and electrolyte disturbances frequently complicate these conditions, necessitating timely organ support. Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) provides effective management of metabolic derangements while enabling precise fluid balance in hemodynamically unstable patients. In trauma and burns, ECTs may facilitate the clearance of myoglobin in severe rhabdomyolysis, support fluid management during resuscitation, and could enable removal of damage or pathogen associated molecular patterns mediating multiorgan failure. In patients with cerebral edema, CKRT offers gradual osmotic control and minimizes intracranial pressure fluctuations compared with intermittent dialysis, making it the preferred modality when kidney replacement therapy is required. We will review current evidence, practical considerations, and emerging extracorporeal strategies, highlighting their role in improving physiological stability and supporting recovery in critically ill patients.
  • Zsolt MolnárHungary Speaker Managing Patients with Sepsis: modifying the course with ECOSA dysregulated host response to infection is central to the pathophysiology of sepsis and may culminate in life-threatening organ dysfunction. Given that this process is largely characterized by concurrent pro- and anti-inflammatory activation, immunomodulatory strategies have long been explored in sepsis research. Among these, extracorporeal removal of circulating cytokines, inflammatory mediators and other soluble factors through non-specific hemoadsorption with macroporous styrene-divinylbenzene sorbents has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. Its adoption into clinical practice has largely been based on pathophysiological considerations rather than on evidence from large, well-designed randomized clinical trials. Over the past 15 years, most of the available evidence has been predominantly derived from small, single-center cohorts, reports from registries and heterogeneous prospective studies with substantial variability in patients’ selection, timing, and treatment intensity. In addition, the precise mechanisms of action of hemoadsorption remain incompletely understood. Although several meta-analyses have attempted to synthesize the existing data, the overall quality and heterogeneity of the included studies limit the strength and reliability of their conclusions. As a result, current guideline recommendations are largely based on expert opinions rather than high-certainty evidence. This presentation aims to provide a concise overview of the biological rationale, current evidence, and contemporary clinical practice related to hemoadsorption in sepsis.Multimodal individualized hemodynamic managementAchieving hemodynamic stability in the critically ill patents has a pivotal role in ensuring positive outcomes. The pathomechanism is complex and include impaired myocardial contractility, relative or absolute intravascular hypovolaemia, bradycardia, and thus eventually impaired blood flow. Arterial pressure can be monitored continuously, which makes it the most important and feasible tool to assess circulation in real time. A given level of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) is often regarded as the main target to be normalized in several guidelines. However, it is not the sole determinant of organ perfusion pressure and, although coupled to blood flow, is not a surrogate of blood flow or tissue perfusion. Conversely, normotension does not guarantee adequate organ blood flow and may just mimic ‘occult hypoperfusion’. Therefore, achieving hemodynamic coherence between macro- and microcirculation should be our pivotal aim during resuscitation and hemodynamic management. This requires a complex approach that is called multimodal, individualised, contextualised management that takes into account all measurable components of oxygen delivery and consumption, organ perfusion and cardiac output. How to do it at the bedside, will be presented on this lecture.
  • Nuttha LumlertgulThailand Speaker Solution and Fluid BalanceUtility of Lung Ultrasound, VEXUS and Bioimpedance Analysis in Volume Assessment During RRTPersonalized Fluid Management with CRRT
  • Thomas RimmeléFrance Speaker Managing Patients with Sepsis: Modifying the Course with ECOSImmune Disorders of AKI Patients Following Various Types of Injuries ?How Do I Use Hemadsorption in My Practice
  • Kianoush KashaniUnited States Speaker Practical Steps to Train (and Become) an AI-Era PhysicianAI in Critical Care Nephrology — State of the Art and the Path from Algorithm to BedsideCritical Care Nephrology: Literature ReviewChat GPT Applications in Critical Care Nephrology
Room 101